Generative AI and the Reinvention of Management Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63345/sjaibt.v1.i2.301Keywords:
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), Management Education, Large Language Models (LLMs), Personalized LearningAbstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly transforming higher education; however, its adoption in management education remains fragmented, with existing studies primarily focusing on conceptual discussions, academic integrity concerns, or isolated classroom applications. Limited research has proposed an integrated framework that combines personalized learning, intelligent tutoring, predictive learning analytics, competency-based assessment, and responsible AI governance within a unified management education ecosystem. To address these gaps, this paper proposes the Generative AI-Enabled Management Education Reinvention Framework (GAI-MERF), an intelligent educational architecture designed to enhance learning outcomes while preserving academic integrity and ethical AI practices. The framework integrates adaptive content generation, AI-driven business case simulations, automated formative assessment, personalized learning recommendations, and predictive analytics to support competency development in strategic thinking, leadership, decision-making, and problem-solving. A quantitative experimental methodology is employed using educational performance data from management students to compare conventional instructional practices with the proposed AI-assisted framework. Multiple evaluation metrics, including academic performance, student engagement, critical thinking, faculty productivity, prediction accuracy, and ethical AI compliance, are used to assess framework effectiveness. Experimental results demonstrate notable improvements across all educational dimensions, indicating that the proposed framework significantly enhances personalized learning, instructional efficiency, and managerial competency development. Furthermore, the integration of transparency, privacy protection, bias mitigation, and human oversight ensures responsible AI adoption within educational environments. The proposed framework provides a scalable and practical foundation for developing intelligent, adaptive, and ethically governed management education systems capable of preparing future business leaders for increasingly AI-driven organizational environments.
Downloads
References
[1] V. Ratten and P. Jones, “Generative artificial intelligence (ChatGPT): Implications for management educators,” The International Journal of Management Education, vol. 21, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100857.
[2] W. M. Lim, A. Gunasekara, J. L. Pallant, J. I. Pallant, and E. Pechenkina, “Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators,” The International Journal of Management Education, vol. 21, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790.
[3] E. Kasneci et al., “ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education,” Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 103, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274.
[4] M. Sollosy and M. McInerney, “Artificial intelligence and business education: What should be taught,” The International Journal of Management Education, vol. 20, no. 3, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100720.
[5] D. R. E. Cotton, P. A. Cotton, and J. R. Shipway, “Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT,” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 228–239, 2024, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148.
[6] J. Su and W. Yang, “Unlocking the power of ChatGPT: A framework for applying generative AI in education,” ECNU Review of Education, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 355–366, 2023, doi: 10.1177/20965311231168423.
[7] E. M. Bender, T. Gebru, A. McMillan-Major, and S. Shmitchell, “On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big?” in Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT), 2021, pp. 610–623, doi: 10.1145/3442188.3445922.
[8] Y. K. Dwivedi et al., “So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 71, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642.
[9] T. K. F. Chiu, “The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education: A case of ChatGPT and Midjourney,” Interactive Learning Environments, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2023.2253861.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Scientific Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain Technologies (SJAIBT)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The license allows re-users to share and adapt the work, as long as credit is given to the author and don't use it for commercial purposes.








