Feedback Collection Tool for Online Classes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63345/Keywords:
Feedback, Online Classes, E-learning, Learning Analytics, Student Engagement, Teaching EffectivenessAbstract
The unprecedented rise of online education has underscored the necessity of structured and continuous feedback mechanisms to maintain instructional quality and ensure meaningful student engagement. Traditional classroom feedback methods—such as informal teacher-student interactions or end-of-course surveys—often fail to capture the nuances of digital learning environments where immediacy, inclusivity, and adaptability are paramount. This study develops and evaluates a Feedback Collection Tool for Online Classes that leverages real-time analytics, multi-modal response formats, and user-centered design principles to enhance both teaching effectiveness and learner satisfaction. Drawing upon theoretical insights from pedagogy, e-learning, and learning analytics, the research integrates design-based methodology with empirical testing across diverse academic cohorts
Downloads
References
• https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSvtuE3w_VZmjDrqI4MY_nv9SQXZRG2cYY7zg&s
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
• Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
• Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning (3rd ed.). Wadsworth.
• Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
• Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
• Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 3–31.
• Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in university assessment: Learning from award-winning practice. Routledge.
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
• Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
• Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Using blended learning: Evidence-based practices. Springer.
• Dawson, P., Henderson, M., Mahoney, P., Phillips, M., Ryan, T., Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2019). What makes for effective feedback: Staff and student perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1467877
• Brookhart, S. M. (2017). How to give effective feedback to your students (2nd ed.). ASCD.
• Draper, S. W. (2009). Catalytic assessment: Understanding how MCQs and EVS can foster deep learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00920.x
• Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in online learning. Online Learning, 22(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
• Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562
• Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
• Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333–2351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004
• Henderson, M., Ryan, T., & Phillips, M. (2019). The challenges of feedback in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 1237–1252. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1599815
• Boud, D., Ajjawi, R., Dawson, P., & Tai, J. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement in higher education: Assessment for knowing and producing quality work. Routledge.
• Zhu, X., & Liu, J. (2020). Education in and after Covid-19: Immediate responses and long-term visions. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00126-3
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Scientific Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain Technologies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The license allows re-users to share and adapt the work, as long as credit is given to the author and don't use it for commercial purposes.
