Blockchain as a Governance Layer for AGI Ethics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63345/Keywords:
AGI Governance, Blockchain, AI Ethics, Decentralized Identity, Verifiable Credentials, Zero-Knowledge Proofs, Auditability, Policy EnforcementAbstract
As artificial general intelligence (AGI) advances toward systems that can autonomously act across domains, the central governance challenge is how to guarantee that ethical principles are specified, enforced, audited, and improved over time without relying on a single, potentially misaligned authority. This manuscript proposes a blockchain-anchored “Ethical Governance Layer” (EGL) for AGI: a layered architecture that couples decentralized identity and membership, on-chain policy specification and versioning, privacy-preserving compliance attestations, tamper-evident auditing, and participatory oversight. We synthesize requirements from prominent governance frameworks (EU AI Act; NIST AI Risk Management Framework; OECD and UNESCO ethics recommendations) and show how distributed ledgers, verifiable credentials, and zero-knowledge proofs can operationalize them in a credibly neutral, transparent, and globally interoperable substrate.
Downloads
References
• Anthropic. (2022). Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI feedback. arXiv:2212.08073. https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.08073
• Bai, Y., Kadavath, S., Kundu, S., Askell, A., et al. (2022). Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI feedback (PDF). https://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.08073
• Ben-Sasson, E., Chiesa, A., Garman, C., Green, M., Miers, I., & Tromer, E. (2014). Zerocash: Decentralized anonymous payments from Bitcoin. IEEE S&P. https://zerocash-project.org/media/pdf/zerocash-oakland2014.pdf
• Bhargavan, K., Delignat-Lavaud, A., Fournet, C., et al. (2016). Formal verification of smart contracts: Short paper. ACM CCS. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2993600.2993611
• Cheng, R., Zhang, F., Kos, J., et al. (2018). Ekiden: A platform for confidentiality-preserving, trustworthy, and performant smart contract execution. arXiv:1804.05141. https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.05141
• European Commission. (2024/2025). AI Act: Regulatory framework for AI (timeline and application). https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai
• European Parliament. (2025, Feb 19). EU AI Act: First regulation on artificial intelligence (overview and timeline). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20230601STO93804/eu-ai-act-first-regulation-on-artificial-intelligence
• Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., et al. (2021). Datasheets for datasets. Communications of the ACM, 64(12), 86–92. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3458723
• Goodman, L. M. (2014). Tezos—A self-amending crypto-ledger (White paper). https://tezos.com/whitepaper.pdf
• Hildenbrandt, E., Saxena, M., Zhu, N., et al. (2018). KEVM: A complete formal semantics of the Ethereum virtual machine. IEEE CSF. https://fsl.cs.illinois.edu/publications/hildenbrandt-saxena-zhu-rodrigues-daian-guth-moore-zhang-park-rosu-2018-csf.pdf
• IEEE Standards Association. (2021). IEEE 7000-2021: Standard model process for addressing ethical concerns during system design. https://standards.ieee.org/standard/7000-2021.html
• MakerDAO. (n.d.). Maker Governance—Governance portal. https://vote.makerdao.com/
• Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., et al. (2019). Model cards for model reporting. FAT* ’19. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3287560.3287596
• NIST. (2023). AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework and PDF https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ai/nist.ai.100-1.pdf
• OECD. (2019). OECD AI Principles. https://oecd.ai/en/ai-principles
• OpenAI. (2025, Apr 15). Our updated Preparedness Framework (with framework PDF). https://openai.com/index/updating-our-preparedness-framework/ and https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/…/preparedness-framework-v2.pdf
• Polkadot. (2024–2025). On-chain governance / OpenGov (Referenda & Conviction Voting). https://docs.polkadot.com/polkadot-protocol/onchain-governance/
• Raji, I. D., Smart, A., White, R. N., et al. (2020). Closing the AI accountability gap: Defining an end-to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing. FAccT ’20. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3351095.3372873
• UNESCO. (2021/2024). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/recommendation-ethics-artificial-intelligence
• W3C. (2022, Jul 19). Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) v1.0—W3C Recommendation. https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/ ; and W3C (2025, May 15). Verifiable Credentials Data Model v2.0—W3C Recommendation. https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model-2.0/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Scientific Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain Technologies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The license allows re-users to share and adapt the work, as long as credit is given to the author and don't use it for commercial purposes.
