Blockchain Use in Open-Access Academic Publishing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63345/sjaibt.v2.i2.204Keywords:
Blockchain, Open-Access Publishing, Peer Review, Academic Transparency, Decentralized Knowledge, Scholarly CommunicationAbstract
The landscape of academic publishing is at a pivotal juncture, as open-access (OA) models have increasingly replaced traditional subscription-based systems to promote global knowledge sharing. Despite their promise, OA publishing still suffers from critical limitations such as escalating article processing charges (APCs), inequitable participation from researchers in developing regions, predatory journals that undermine credibility, and opaque peer-review mechanisms. Blockchain technology, characterized by its decentralization, immutability, and transparency, offers disruptive potential to address these challenges. This study critically explores the use of blockchain in open-access publishing by integrating bibliometric analysis, survey data from 350 international researchers, and case study evaluation of existing blockchain-based publishing platforms. Findings reveal that blockchain can transform scholarly communication through transparent peer-review records, decentralized copyright protection, verifiable citation tracking, and tokenized incentive mechanisms for equitable funding. Statistical analysis highlights that 64% of researchers identify APCs as the primary barrier, while 57% emphasize the lack of transparent peer review—both of which blockchain directly addresses. Nevertheless, unresolved issues of scalability, governance, and long-term sustainability indicate that blockchain cannot function as a standalone solution. Instead, a hybrid model integrating blockchain with institutional and governmental oversight emerges as the most feasible pathway. This study contributes to the discourse on reimagining scholarly publishing by presenting blockchain not as a technological trend, but as a foundational tool for creating a democratized, transparent, and inclusive knowledge ecosystem.
Downloads
References
• https://openaccessbelgium.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/schema_oa.png
• https://i.pinimg.com/736x/87/93/1e/87931e0e5b37e08653efaa5f8e81d809.jpg
• Bartling, S., & Fecher, B. (2020). Transparent peer review and blockchain technology: Reimagining scholarly communication. Frontiers in Blockchain, 3(12), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2020.00012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2020.00012
• Beall, J. (2017). Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 99(2), 77–79. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2016.0306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2016.0056
• Björk, B. C., & Solomon, D. (2015). Article processing charges in OA journals: Relationship between price and quality. Scientometrics, 103(2), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1556-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1556-z
• Chohan, U. W. (2021). Blockchain in academic publishing: Opportunities for innovation. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3892842 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3892842
• De Filippi, P., & Wright, A. (2018). Blockchain and the law: The rule of code. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674985933
• Fraser, N., & Kramer, B. (2019). The evolving role of preprints in scholarly publishing. Learned Publishing, 32(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1218 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1218
• Gipp, B., Breitinger, C., Meuschke, N., & Beel, J. (2017). CryptSubmit: Introducing secure cryptographic timestamping for electronic submissions. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/JCDL.2017.7991576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JCDL.2017.7991588
• Guadamuz, A., & Marsden, C. (2015). Blockchains and copyright. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 29(3), 242–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2015.1123876
• Holmberg, K., Hedman, J., Bowman, T. D., Didegah, F., & Laakso, M. (2019). Innovations in scholarly communication: Data sharing, peer review and blockchain. Journal of Documentation, 75(6), 1202–1218. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2019-0052
• Khan, F., & Salah, K. (2018). IoT security: Review, blockchain solutions, and open challenges. Future Generation Computer Systems, 82, 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.11.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.11.022
• Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2016). Hybrid open access – A longitudinal study. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 919–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.08.002
• Memon, A. R. (2021). Predatory publishing and the misuse of blockchain for academic integrity. Accountability in Research, 28(6), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1868956
• Pujar, S. M., & Satyanarayana, K. (2015). Open access publishing: A developing country perspective. Learned Publishing, 28(4), 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150408 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1087/20150408
• Sharples, M., & Domingue, J. (2016). The blockchain and kudos: A new model for academic reputation. Proceedings of the ACM Web Science Conference, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/2908131.2908183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2908131.2908183
• Shuaib, K., Al Kalbani, A., Al Barashdi, H., & Al Maashri, A. (2020). A blockchain-based framework for secure and transparent academic publishing. IEEE Access, 8, 201475–201490. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3036711
• Solomon, D. J., & Björk, B. C. (2016). Article processing charges for open access publication—The situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada. PeerJ, 4, e2264. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2264 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2264
• Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. O’Reilly Media.
• Tennant, J. P., et al. (2019). Ten myths around open scholarly publishing. PeerJ Preprints, 7, e27580v2. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27580v2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27580v1
• Van Rossum, J., & Van Dam, H. J. J. (2020). Blockchain for research: Perspectives on a new paradigm for scholarly communication. Data Intelligence, 2(1-2), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00028
• Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in predatory journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Scientific Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain Technologies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The license allows re-users to share and adapt the work, as long as credit is given to the author and don't use it for commercial purposes.








