AI-Assisted Consensus Mechanisms for Scalable Blockchain Networks

Authors

  • Lucky Jha ABESIT Crossings Republik, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201009 Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63345/sjaibt.v2.i2.301

Keywords:

Blockchain, Consensus Mechanisms, Artificial Intelligence, Reinforcement Learning, Scalability, Decentralized Systems, Proof of Stake, Federated Consensus, Machine Learning, Predictive Optimization

Abstract

Blockchain technology has emerged as a transformative paradigm for secure, decentralized, and transparent data management. However, the rapid growth of decentralized applications (dApps), global transaction demands, and multi-chain ecosystems has exposed scalability bottlenecks in existing consensus mechanisms. Traditional models such as Proof of Work (PoW) and Proof of Stake (PoS), while effective in maintaining security, struggle with throughput, latency, and energy efficiency. Recent research highlights the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to augment blockchain consensus by improving leader selection, optimizing validator participation, dynamically adjusting difficulty, and predicting network anomalies. This manuscript explores AI-assisted consensus mechanisms as a scalable alternative for next-generation blockchain systems. The paper conducts a comprehensive literature review of blockchain scalability challenges, outlines a methodology for integrating reinforcement learning (RL), deep learning, and predictive analytics into consensus protocols, and presents simulation-based results. Findings suggest that AI-enhanced consensus can achieve up to 70% improved throughput, reduce energy costs by 50%, and enhance fault tolerance by predicting malicious node behavior in advance. The study concludes that AI-assisted consensus mechanisms provide a sustainable path toward highly scalable, adaptive, and secure blockchain networks, with implications for finance, supply chains, IoT, and government applications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

https://www.mdpi.com/electronics/electronics-12-04214/article_deploy/html/images/electronics-12-04214-g003.png

https://pub.mdpi-res.com/sustainability/sustainability-15-01374/article_deploy/html/images/sustainability-15-01374-g001.png?1673428204

• Abbas, H., & Khan, L. (2022). Artificial intelligence–driven optimization for blockchain consensus protocols. IEEE Access, 10(1), 45321–45334. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3157391

• Androulaki, E., Barger, A., Bortnikov, V., Cachin, C., Christidis, K., De Caro, A., … & Yellick, J. (2018). Hyperledger Fabric: A distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains. Proceedings of the Thirteenth EuroSys Conference, 1–15.

• Bahri, O., & Bensaou, B. (2021). Reinforcement learning–based leader election in blockchain consensus. Future Generation Computer Systems, 120, 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2021.02.001

• Bouri, E., Gupta, R., & Roubaud, D. (2019). Herding behavior in cryptocurrencies. Finance Research Letters, 29, 216–221.

• Cachin, C., & Vukolić, M. (2017). Blockchain consensus protocols in the wild. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.01873.

• Chaudhry, N., & Yousaf, M. M. (2019). Blockchain and artificial intelligence for the next generation of Internet of Things. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 144, 13–22.

• Chen, L., Xu, L. D., & Lu, Y. (2020). Towards intelligent blockchain for cyber physical systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 16(7), 4678–4689.

• Conti, M., Kumar, E. S., Lal, C., & Ruj, S. (2018). A survey on security and privacy issues of blockchain technology. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 21(2), 1–31.

• Dinh, T. T. A., Wang, J., Chen, G., Liu, R., Ooi, B. C., & Tan, K. L. (2017). BLOCKBENCH: A framework for analyzing private blockchains. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Management of Data, 1085–1100.

• Eyal, I., & Sirer, E. G. (2014). Majority is not enough: Bitcoin mining is vulnerable. Financial Cryptography and Data Security, 8437, 436–454.

• Gai, K., Wu, Y., Zhu, L., Qiu, M., & Shen, M. (2019). Privacy-preserving energy trading using consortium blockchain in smart grid. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15(6), 3548–3558.

• Hassan, M. U., Rehmani, M. H., & Chen, J. (2019). Privacy preservation in blockchain based IoT systems: Integration issues, prospects, challenges, and future research directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 97, 512–529.

• Huang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2020). AI-based anomaly detection for blockchain consensus security. Computers & Security, 99, 102059.

• King, S., & Nadal, S. (2012). PPCoin: Peer-to-Peer crypto-currency with proof-of-stake. Self-published white paper.

• Li, J., Wu, J., Chen, L., & Long, C. (2021). Artificial intelligence–driven consensus mechanisms for blockchain scalability. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(12), 9568–9580.

• Lin, I. C., & Liao, T. C. (2017). A survey of blockchain security issues and challenges. International Journal of Network Security, 19(5), 653–659.

• Nguyen, Q. K. (2019). Blockchain: A financial technology for future sustainable development. International Journal of Energy Research, 43(6), 2304–2310.

• Saha, S., Kumar, R., & Pattanaik, K. K. (2020). Enhancing blockchain consensus with deep reinforcement learning. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 143, 148–158.

• Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. O’Reilly Media.

• Vukolić, M. (2016). The quest for scalable blockchain fabric: Proof-of-Work vs. BFT replication. International Workshop on Open Problems in Network Security (iNetSec), 112–125.

Published

02-06-2025

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

How to Cite

AI-Assisted Consensus Mechanisms for Scalable Blockchain Networks. (2025). Scientific Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain Technologies, 2(2), Jun (1-9). https://doi.org/10.63345/sjaibt.v2.i2.301

Similar Articles

1-10 of 97

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.