Ethical Frameworks for AI and Blockchain Co-Governance

Authors

  • Akshun Chhapola Delhi Technical University Rohini, New Delhi, India 110042 Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63345/sjaibt.v1.i1.105

Keywords:

AI ethics, blockchain governance, co-governance frameworks, transparency, accountability, fairness, data privacy, smart contracts, algorithmic bias, responsible innovation

Abstract

The convergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and blockchain technologies represents one of the most significant shifts in socio-technical governance frameworks of the 21st century. AI contributes adaptive intelligence, predictive modeling, and automated decision-making, while blockchain offers distributed trust, tamper-proof records, and decentralized enforcement through smart contracts. Together, these technologies create powerful synergies, enabling transparent, accountable, and efficient systems. However, their integration raises complex ethical questions that extend beyond the scope of conventional regulatory paradigms. Key concerns include algorithmic bias, explainability deficits, energy sustainability, privacy rights, jurisdictional fragmentation, and risks of techno-elitism.

This manuscript investigates the ethical dimensions of AI–Blockchain co-governance through an interdisciplinary lens, integrating philosophical ethics, legal principles, technological affordances, and empirical stakeholder perspectives. Drawing upon deontological, consequentialist, and virtue ethics approaches, the study develops a comprehensive framework for embedding ethics “by design” into AI–Blockchain ecosystems. Using a mixed-methods methodology—including a survey of 300 global stakeholders, expert interviews, and literature synthesis—the research identifies privacy, accountability, fairness, and transparency as the most pressing governance imperatives. The statistical analysis further reveals divergences in priorities between industry actors (favoring efficiency and innovation) and regulators (emphasizing compliance, inclusivity, and risk mitigation).

The findings advocate for a hybrid ethical model where blockchain-based immutability reinforces AI accountability, while human-in-the-loop oversight ensures contextual judgment. Novel governance strategies such as explainable smart contracts, differential privacy mechanisms, and sustainability-conscious consensus algorithms emerge as critical enablers of responsible co-governance. By bridging theoretical ethics with applied governance, this work contributes not only to scholarly discourse but also to practical policymaking, offering a roadmap for ensuring that AI–Blockchain systems are deployed in ways that balance innovation with responsibility, global interoperability with local sensitivity, and technological advancement with human dignity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

https://media.springernature.com/lw1200/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13520-023-00181-6/MediaObjects/13520_2023_181_Fig1_HTML.png

https://www.tandfonline.com/cms/asset/95a94519-aef0-4ad4-ab70-6aac3135d0ae/tjis_a_1927212_f0001_b.gif

• Allen, A. L. (2016). Privacy law and society. West Academic Publishing.

• Albrecht, J. P. (2016). How the GDPR will change the world. European Data Protection Law Review, 2(3), 287–289. https://doi.org/10.21552/EDPL/2016/3/6

• Beck, R., Müller-Bloch, C., & King, J. L. (2018). Governance in the blockchain economy: A framework and research agenda. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(10), 1020–1034. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00518

• Bryson, J. (2018). Patiency is not a virtue: The design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 20(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9448-6

• Cath, C. (2018). Governing artificial intelligence: Ethical, legal, and technical opportunities and challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2133), 20180080. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0080

• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.

• European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (AI Act). Brussels: European Union. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu

• Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1

• Goggin, G., & Hjorth, L. (2020). Global AI ethics: Developing international policy and practice. AI & Society, 35(4), 905–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00960-w

• Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2

• Mittelstadt, B. (2019). Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(11), 501–507. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4

• Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Goldfeder, S. (2016). Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies. Princeton University Press.

• OECD. (2019). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://legalinstruments.oecd.org

• Risius, M., & Spohrer, K. (2017). A blockchain research framework. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59(6), 385–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0506-0

• Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. O’Reilly Media.

• Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain revolution: How the technology behind bitcoin is changing money, business, and the world. Penguin.

• UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org

• Werbach, K. (2018). The blockchain and the new architecture of trust. MIT Press.

• Whittlestone, J., Nyrup, R., Alexandrova, A., & Cave, S. (2019). The role and limits of principles in AI ethics. Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314289

• Zwitter, A., & Boisse-Despiaux, M. (2018). Blockchain for humanitarian action and development aid. Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 3(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-018-0034-2

Published

09-01-2024

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

How to Cite

Ethical Frameworks for AI and Blockchain Co-Governance. (2024). Scientific Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain Technologies, 1(1), Jan (37-45). https://doi.org/10.63345/sjaibt.v1.i1.105

Similar Articles

1-10 of 81

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.