Data Sovereignty in Global AI-Blockchain Infrastructure

Authors

  • Prof (Dr) Ajay Shriram Kushwaha Sharda University Knowledge Park III, Greater Noida, U.P. 201310, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63345/sjaibt.v1.i3.102

Keywords:

Data Sovereignty, Cross-Border Data Flows, AI Governance, Blockchain Compliance, Privacy-Enhancing Technologies, Federated Learning, Sovereign Cloud, GDPR, EU AI Act, Global CBPR

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) systems scale across borders and decentralized ledgers interconnect global networks, a central challenge emerges: how to ensure data sovereignty—the ability of jurisdictions, organizations, and individuals to exert legitimate control over data—without stifling innovation or undermining the integrity and utility of distributed architectures. This manuscript proposes a comprehensive, practice-oriented blueprint for embedding data sovereignty into AI-blockchain infrastructure. We first synthesize the legal and policy landscape shaping cross-border processing (e.g., GDPR, Schrems II, SCCs, EU–U.S. Data Privacy Framework, EU AI Act, Data Governance Act, Data Act, CLOUD Act, India’s DPDP Act, China’s PIPL, OECD/G7 initiatives, and Global CBPR). We then examine technical levers—on-chain/off-chain partitioning, permissioned topologies, sovereign cloud patterns, privacy-enhancing computation, verifiable provenance, and risk management frameworks—to operationalize jurisdictional constraints without losing decentralization benefits. Building on this review, we introduce SOVEREIGN-Stack, a governance-by-design methodology spanning eight layers (identity, consent, data classification, locality & routing, compute & model governance, ledger governance, transfer mechanisms, and assurance/tooling). Two applied vignettes—in health analytics spanning the EU, U.S., and India, and a permissioned supply-chain ledger touching the EU and APAC—demonstrate how the approach balances legal obligations (erasure, purpose limitation, transfer restrictions) with architectural needs (immutability, integrity, transparency). We conclude with a set of implementation checkpoints and maturity indicators that organizations can use to align AI-blockchain roadmaps with evolving global rules while maintaining verifiability, auditability, and performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

• European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj

• European Commission. (2025, August 1). EU rules on general-purpose AI models start to apply, bringing more transparency, safety and accountability. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu

• National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) (NIST AI 100-1). https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1

• European Union. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation). EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj

• Court of Justice of the European Union. (2020, July 16). Press Release No 91/20: Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland and Maximillian Schrems (Schrems II). https://curia.europa.eu

• European Commission. (2021, June 4). Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/914 on standard contractual clauses for the transfer of personal data to third countries. EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec_impl/2021/914/oj

• European Commission. (2023, July 10). Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/1795 on the adequate level of protection under the EU–U.S. Data Privacy Framework. EUR-Lex.

• U.S. Department of Justice. (n.d.). CLOUD Act resources. https://www.justice.gov/criminal/cloud-act-resources

• Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (India). (2023). Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. https://www.meity.gov.in

• Stanford DigiChina. (2021). Translation: Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) of the People’s Republic of China. https://digichina.stanford.edu

• OECD. (2019/2024). OECD AI Principles. https://oecd.ai/en/ai-principles

• G7. (2023, May 20). Hiroshima Leaders’ Communiqué (DFFT). Council of the EU. https://www.consilium.europa.eu

• Global CBPR Forum. (2025). Global CBPR Forum—Building digital trust through partnerships. https://www.globalcbpr.org

• European Union. (2022). Regulation (EU) 2022/868 (Data Governance Act). EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/868/oj

• European Union. (2023). Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 (Data Act). EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/2854/oj

• Hyperledger Fabric. (n.d.). Private data collection definition. https://hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io

• International Organization for Standardization. (2020). ISO 22739:2020—Blockchain and distributed ledger technologies—Vocabulary. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui

• European Data Protection Board. (2025, April 8). Guidelines 02/2025 on processing of personal data through blockchain technologies. https://www.edpb.europa.eu

• Gaia-X AISBL. (n.d.). About Gaia-X: A federated secure data infrastructure. https://gaia-x.eu/about/

• European Commission. (2025, July 10). The General-Purpose AI Code of Practice (GPAI). https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu

Published

03-07-2024

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

How to Cite

Data Sovereignty in Global AI-Blockchain Infrastructure. (2024). Scientific Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain Technologies, 1(3), Jul (10-19). https://doi.org/10.63345/sjaibt.v1.i3.102

Similar Articles

41-50 of 108

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.